有利可图,but a company and the government will be facing prosecution

送交者: Wood 于 2006-11-04, 17:42:45:

回答: Not true. 那不是真实原因由 Latino2 于 2006-11-04, 17:32:25:

by either the human-right or the environmentalist,
and compensation / fine can be huge.

This is how investing in Africa is not profitable,
if these people are watching you,
you would alway pay more than you can earn
and frequently need to defend yourself in the court.

So they decided to either do nothing or
do something if they can fill the forms and
pass some human right/environmental assessments.

所有跟贴:

a better answer might be - Wood (430 bytes) 2006-11-04, 18:02:21 (109972)
It does not reflect what the big oil companies are doing - Latino2 (14 bytes) 2006-11-04, 17:50:15 (109968)
- anything in Zimbabwe? (无内容) - Wood (0 bytes) 2006-11-04, 17:55:51 (109970)
  - It's not fair to cite a case under international saction (无内容) - Latino2 (0 bytes) 2006-11-04, 17:58:02 (109971)
    - why saction? saction only kill civilians - Wood (224 bytes) 2006-11-04, 18:06:15 (109973)
      - No disagreement on this point. - Latino2 (290 bytes) 2006-11-04, 18:12:27 (109974)
        
        Environmental band african countries from growing GM crops - Wood (34 bytes) 2006-11-04, 18:21:31 (109977)

加跟贴