送交者: HunHunSheng 于 2006-12-07, 14:12:35:

回答: 田刚当然是诚实的人.丘帮人士恼羞成怒了? 由 lookat 于 2006-12-07, 13:12:46:

• 所以他有可能与北大合谋骗教育部 - xinku (202 bytes) 2006-12-07, 14:23:33 (114768)
  • It does not matter. Tian is only responsible for his employer (无内容) - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2006-12-07, 14:26:01 (114769)
    • 大家首先不要自己清高也不要让别人清高科学家稿科学的目的就是一个拿工资养家糊口 - HunHunSheng (137 bytes) 2006-12-07, 14:28:26 (114771)
      • 目的之一 - Nixrreg (744 bytes) 2006-12-07, 14:54:37 (114780)
        • 即使自己是个什么. 反正早晚都要死干吗. 把这个看那么重 (无内容) - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2006-12-07, 15:04:32 (114781)
      • But if the employer is suspected to have some illegal activities - xinku (85 bytes) 2006-12-07, 14:38:04 (114774)
        • Any laws says Beida can not pay her employee 10 months's salary - HunHunSheng (83 bytes) 2006-12-07, 14:47:54 (114777)
          • 你又开始胡缠了,人家不是长江特聘么 - Kurt (60 bytes) 2006-12-07, 15:43:55 (114797)
          • 我国宪法规定 - xinku (56 bytes) 2006-12-07, 15:10:28 (114784)
            • 这个案子跟宪法无关 - Nixrreg (189 bytes) 2006-12-07, 15:35:35 (114794)
            • 这个由雇主掌握 (无内容) - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2006-12-07, 15:13:54 (114787)
              • 那是米国，在中国是全国人大才有权解释宪法 (无内容) - At@ (0 bytes) 2006-12-07, 17:01:01 (114813)
              • In china, it is up to the lawmaker, namely National People's Congress, - steven (80 bytes) 2006-12-07, 16:17:41 (114807)
              • Employer has the right to determine its employee's worth (无内容) - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2006-12-07, 15:32:22 (114790)
              • 雇主也没权利解释宪法。只有最高法院才有这个权。 - xinku (14 bytes) 2006-12-07, 15:16:48 (114789)
• 那是教育部agreed的. (无内容) - lookat (0 bytes) 2006-12-07, 14:23:16 (114767)

加跟贴