送交者: BerkeleyWolf 于 2006-3-22, 11:53:21:

回答: CACM should not be treated as an acedamical journal now 由 xinku 于 2006-3-22, 10:04:06:

but it is an acadamical journal (magazine). no question about this.

• but CACM is very different from JACM - xinku (326 bytes) 2006-3-22, 12:05:00
  • hey, you may misunderstand my post - BerkeleyWolf (951 bytes) 2006-3-22, 12:35:40
    • OK, shake hands..... - xinku (0 bytes) 2006-3-22, 12:40:26
      • Thank you for your posts - BerkeleyWolf (279 bytes) 2006-3-22, 12:46:08
        • Maybe the most significant research in CS is becoming non-easy-to-read anyway? - xinku (0 bytes) 2006-3-22, 12:57:45
          • Sure. I feel sad about this. - BerkeleyWolf (234 bytes) 2006-3-22, 13:11:29
  • JACM's scope - xinku (1545 bytes) 2006-3-22, 12:17:06
  • CACM's scope - xinku (1563 bytes) 2006-3-22, 12:16:03

加跟贴