送交者: mangolasi 于 2005-5-02, 16:20:22:

回答: 本人猜测：文科与理科的区别 由 Enlighten 于 2005-5-02, 16:10:26:

of economy phenomenon itself. It's neccessary to make very clear the assumptions (i.e. which direction of approximation).

Many engineering-kind articles (not econometrics, but economics!) are actually leading to very ideological results since they are viewing those time-series are produced in a lab, not in a society(many famous RBC guys are fellows of Hoover institute. Some even refer to Heritage Foundation.) Those are 2nd-tier engineers 1st-tier economists (It's the profession's shame to let this happen since less technical people are fooled by the seemingly fancy math techniques).

What makes a good economist(not econometrics) shouldn't be math, rather should be the profound insight of the society. Math should be jsut the tool.

• Now that makes sense. In other words, it's the formulation - Enlighten (59 bytes) 2005-5-02, 16:33:43
  • I really doubt whether there is "solution"...especially overwhelmed - mangolasi (24 bytes) 2005-5-02, 16:35:34

加跟贴