送交者: Enlighten 于 2007-10-24, 09:32:51:
回答: 笑死了,看来不把英文端上来还真容易让小白误解 由 Rossonero 于 2007-10-24, 09:04:58:
Frances Kamm's 'Principle of Permissible Harm' is an effort to derive a deontological constraint which coheres with our considered case judgments while also relying heavily on Kant's Categorical Imperative.[12]
The Principle states that one may harm in order to save more if and only if the harm is an effect or an aspect of the greater good itself.
“one may harm in order to save more ”这难道不是功利的影子吗?deontological不考虑后果本身就是愚蠢的。