送交者: HunHunSheng 于 2006-3-22, 09:46:10:

but it is only good for Qinghua (or maybe even bad from another angle) not for China. It is certainly a bad things to uniformly random distribute good talents
across all universities regardless of their ranking
but I think it is equalkly bad if too many talents
are concentrated on a very few top universities.

America education system is good because it
has certain balance between too concentration and
to spread out.

• You miss the point - BerkeleyWolf (544 bytes) 2006-3-22, 12:41:53
  • The differences (American have many top and Chian only 2) is the outcome - HunHunSheng (249 bytes) 2006-3-22, 12:50:45
    • it is a egg and chicken problem - BerkeleyWolf (123 bytes) 2006-3-22, 13:08:57
      • These top universities wer enot TOP at the beginning - HunHunSheng (63 bytes) 2006-3-22, 13:10:52
        • Harvard is a top at the beginning. - BerkeleyWolf (135 bytes) 2006-3-22, 13:13:33
• This 2+N model is very bad for China and bad for these top two as well - HunHunSheng (82 bytes) 2006-3-22, 09:52:43
  • hehe... 10+M is a better solution - BerkeleyWolf (0 bytes) 2006-3-22, 13:18:05

加跟贴